milksmyhero wrote:But see that's the thing, "gay" only seems to encompass one type of group within the LGBT community - people who are exclusively attracted to people of the same gender ("lesbian" and "gay" seem to be used interchangeably for girls). That doesn't accurately describe people who are Transgendered or Bi. "Queer" seems to provide a way to encompass everyone (even people who question their sexuality) without having to go through the LGBT,GLBT,LGBTQI,etc terminology nightmare.
Being gay though, I feel more compelled to use the word "homo" to describe myself. Because it allows me to counter-actively use "hetero" when referring to people who are attracted to people of the opposite gender. "Straight" kinda gives the impression that heteros are somehow innately good and better.
I came across an article a month ago that mentioned how scientific communities are now actually starting to use the terms Androphilia and Gynephilia (emotional attraction to guys and girls respectively) because it allows for the description of a person's orientation without attaching it to the person's gender. Like, you can be a guy who's an Androphile (homo) or a Gynephile (hetero).
milksmyhero wrote:Being gay though, I feel more compelled to use the word "homo" to describe myself.
Zed wrote: Do we really need one term to refer to all gays, lesbians, bisexuals, transgenders etc. etc. collectively? Should we be lumping transgender and intersex in with gays, lesbians and bisexuals? In some cases it seems like our only similarities are in our being different from the 'norm'. I think LGB works fine. Or GBL. BLT. Mmm...BLT...Anyways, my point is sexual orientation is different from alternate gender identities and should be recognized as such.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest